BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Center for Constitutional Design - ECPv6.3.3.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Center for Constitutional Design
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Center for Constitutional Design
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Phoenix
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:20230101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230301T121500
DTEND;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230301T131500
DTSTAMP:20260508T151745
CREATED:20230221T165638Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230221T221857Z
UID:1537-1677672900-1677676500@constitutionaldesign.asu.edu
SUMMARY:The Irrelevant First Amendment
DESCRIPTION:A Presentation by Ashutosh Bhagwat  \n\n\n\nwith Commentary by James Weinstein \n\n\n\n\n\nRoom 150\, Beus Center for Law and Society \n\n\n\nThe Center for Constitutional Design will host a conversation about whether the First Amendment continues to protect free expression in contemporary American society. \n\n\n\nDespite its cultural prominence and the Roberts’ Court’s broad interpretations andvigorous enforcement of it\, in today’s world the First Amendment provides little or noprotection for free expression in the most contested areas for a number of reasons. Firstand foremost\, the vast majority of public discourse today occurs on privately-ownedinternet platforms\, yet the state action doctrine means that the First Amendment does notconstrain content moderation and/or censorship by these platforms. In addition\, in recentyears the Supreme Court has greatly expanded the government’s power to exercise controlover speech internal to the government itself\, free of First Amendment constraints. Thesedevelopments have effectively immunized from First Amendment scrutiny such things asFlorida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law aggressively restricting speech by classroom teachers\, or thecurrent wave of bans on books discussing race discrimination and sexual orientation inpublic school (and sometimes public) libraries. Finally\, under current law the FirstAmendment also does not touch upon ideological conformity imposed by privateemployers\, including private universities supposedly committed to academic freedom\, asillustrated by the recent fiascos at Hamline University and Harvard’s Kennedy School. So\,what is to be done? Should First Amendment doctrine be altered to extend FirstAmendment protection to platform users\, government employees\, and private universitystudents and employees? Or are we to acknowledge that the Golden Age of the FirstAmendment is over? \n\n\n\nBring your questions and join us for lunch and a provocative conversation about the continued relevance of the First Amendment. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Ashutosh Bhagwat              \n              \n          \n            Boochever and Bird Endowed Chair for the Study and Teaching of Freedom and Equality and Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law           \n        \n                          \n          Read More\n         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  James Weinstein               \n              \n          \n            Dan Cracchiolo Chair in Constitutional Law in the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law\, a faculty fellow in the Center for Law\, Science and Innovation at Arizona State University and an associate fellow with the Centre for Public Law at the University of Cambridge.            \n        \n                          \n          Read More
URL:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/event/the-irrelevant-first-amendment-2/
LOCATION:Location: Beus Center for Law and Society\, 111 E Taylor St\, Phoenix\, Arizona\, 85004\, United States
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Screenshot-2023-02-21-141125.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230316T143000
DTEND;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230316T160000
DTSTAMP:20260508T151745
CREATED:20230213T205935Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230301T002722Z
UID:1391-1678977000-1678982400@constitutionaldesign.asu.edu
SUMMARY:Amendment Reform in America and Abroad  
DESCRIPTION:ARIZONA TIME 2:30 PM – 4:00 PM  \n\n\n\nEASTERN TIME 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nThe National Constitution Center and the Center for Constitutional Design at Arizona State University present a comparative discussion focused on the various systems of amending constitutions at home and around the world. Join a panel of distinguished scholars\, including Wilfred Codrington of Brooklyn Law School\, Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit\, and Rosalind Dixon of the University of New South Wales\, Faculty of Law\, for a webinar conversation\, as they survey the world’s various constitutional democracies to explore the similarities and differences in constitutional amendment processes across the globe\, and explore questions surrounding federal amendment reform in the United States. Jeffrey Rosen\, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center\, moderates.   \n\n\n\nThis webinar program is presented in partnership with the National Constitution Center. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Jeffrey Rosen – Moderator               \n              \n          \n            CEO of the National Constitution Center           \n        \n                          \n          Read More\n         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Hon. Jeffrey S. Sutton              \n              \n          \n            Chief Judge\, United States Court of Appeals\, Sixth Circuit           \n        \n                          \n          Read More         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Wilfred Codrington III               \n              \n          \n            Person Title\, Company or Organization           \n        \n                          \n          Read More\n         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Rosalind Dixon              \n              \n          \n            Professor of law at the University of New South Wales\, Faculty of Law           \n        \n                          \n          Read More
URL:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/event/amendment-reform-in-america-and-abroad/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Screenshot-2023-02-03-174517.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230323T121500
DTEND;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230323T131500
DTSTAMP:20260508T151745
CREATED:20221214T030921Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230303T163332Z
UID:1260-1679573700-1679577300@constitutionaldesign.asu.edu
SUMMARY:Can the Legislative Power Be Delegated to the Administrative State?
DESCRIPTION:Can the legislative power be delegated? Is the “major questions” doctrine” a suitable alternative to the non-delegation doctrine – the doctrine that states that a delegated power (and Congress’ powers are delegated from the people) cannot be re-delegated.  What are the implications of the dispute over the delegation of legislative power for constitutional good governance and the future of the administrative state?” \n\n\n\nJoin us for a debate about whether the legislative power can be delegated between Professor James Stoner\, Hermann Moyse\, Jr.\, Professor and Director of the Eric Voegelin Institute in the Department of Political Science at Louisiana State University\, and Michael Rappaport\, the Hugh & Hazel Darling Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law\, where he is also the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism. \n\n\n\nThis debate is co-sponsored by the Center for Constitutional Design and the Federalist Society\, Arizona State Student Chapter. \n\n\n\nCLE credit provided. \n\n\n\nRoom 250 at Beus Center for Law and Society\, 111 E. Taylor St. Phoenix\, AZ 85004 \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Clint Bolick – Moderator              \n              \n          \n            Justice  |  Arizona Supreme Court \n           \n        \n                          \n          Read More         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  James Stoner               \n              \n          \n            Professor and Director of the Eric Voegelin Institute in the Department of Political Science at Louisiana State University           \n        \n                          \n          Read More         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Michael Rappaport              \n              \n          \n            Hugh & Hazel Darling Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law\, and Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism           \n        \n                          \n          Read More
URL:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/event/can-the-legislative-power-be-delegated-to-the-administrative-state/
LOCATION:Beus Center for Law and Society\, 111 E Taylor St\, Phoenix\, Arizona\, 85004\, United States
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Screenshot-2022-12-20-134306.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230327T150000
DTEND;TZID=America/Phoenix:20230327T161500
DTSTAMP:20260508T151745
CREATED:20230315T192231Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230516T204428Z
UID:1588-1679929200-1679933700@constitutionaldesign.asu.edu
SUMMARY:Five New Amendments: Next Steps for Constitutional Change
DESCRIPTION:Join the Center for Constitutional Design and the National Constitution Center for a discussion of the amendments to the Constitution proposed by the National Constitution Center’s Constitution Drafting Project. This pathbreaking initiative asked three teams of progressive\, libertarian\, and conservative scholars to convene online for a constitutional convention. After a week of dialogue\, deliberation and compromise\, the ideologically diverse delegates agreed on proposals for five constitutional amendments\, ranging from term limits for Supreme Court justices to resurrecting the legislative veto and making it easier for national majorities to amend the Constitution.  In a conversation moderated by NCC President and CEO Jeffrey Rosen\, leaders of the three teams—Caroline Fredrickson\, of the Georgetown Law School and senior fellow at the Brennan Center; Ilan Wurman\, of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University\, and Ilya Shapiro\, of the Manhattan Institute—are joined by Stefanie Lindquist\, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Design at Arizona State University to discuss the amendments and the next steps for constitutional reform. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Jeffrey Rosen- Moderator              \n              \n          \n            President and CEO of National Constitution Center           \n        \n                          \n          Read More         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Caroline Fredrickson              \n              \n          \n            Professor at Georgetown Law           \n        \n                          \n          Read More         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Ilan Wurman              \n              \n          \n            Associate Professor of Law\, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law           \n        \n                          \n          Read More         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Ilya Shapiro              \n              \n          \n            Senior Fellow and Director of constitutional studies at the Manhattan Institute           \n        \n                          \n          Read More         \n                \n  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n          \n                  \n              \n        \n      \n                  Stefanie Lindquist              \n              \n          \n            Executive Director | Center for Constitutional Design\nFoundation Professor of Law and Political Science | Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law           \n        \n                          \n          Read More
URL:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/event/five-amendments-next-steps-for-constitutional-change/
LOCATION:Online
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://constitutionaldesign.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Screenshot-2023-03-14-154119.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR